Smith & Wesson's M&P (Military & Police) pistol series has become a mainstay in law enforcement and civilian markets alike. The original M&P, known for its reliability and ergonomics, paved the way for the M&P 2.0, which boasts several improvements. This detailed comparison will delve into the key differences between these two popular handguns to help you decide which best suits your needs.
Key Differences Between the M&P and M&P 2.0
While both share the same fundamental design philosophy, several significant upgrades distinguish the M&P 2.0 from its predecessor. These improvements primarily focus on ergonomics, trigger, and overall handling.
1. Grip Texture and Ergonomics:
-
M&P: Features a relatively smooth grip texture, which some users find less aggressive than ideal. The grip angle is also slightly less pronounced.
-
M&P 2.0: Boasts a significantly improved grip texture, offering a more secure and comfortable hold, even with sweaty hands. The grip angle is more aggressive, promoting a higher and more natural point of aim. This improved grip contributes substantially to improved accuracy and control. The addition of interchangeable backstraps allows for even further customization to fit a wider range of hand sizes.
2. Trigger:
-
M&P: The original M&P trigger is often described as having a somewhat gritty feel and a longer reset.
-
M&P 2.0: The M&P 2.0 features a significantly improved trigger. The trigger pull is smoother, crisper, and shorter, resulting in improved accuracy and faster follow-up shots. The shorter reset also contributes to quicker target acquisition. Many shooters find the 2.0 trigger a significant improvement.
3. Slide Serrations:
-
M&P: The original M&P features front and rear slide serrations, which provide adequate grip for racking the slide.
-
M&P 2.0: Maintains front and rear serrations but often includes more aggressive texturing, further improving the user's ability to manipulate the slide, even under stress.
4. Ambidextrous Features:
-
M&P: Offers limited ambidextrous features.
-
M&P 2.0: Includes ambidextrous slide stop levers and magazine release buttons, catering to both right-handed and left-handed shooters. This is a considerable upgrade for users preferring a southpaw stance.
5. Sight Configuration:
-
M&P: Typically comes with standard sights, which are functional but may not be optimal for all users.
-
M&P 2.0: Often includes improved sights, sometimes featuring a fiber optic front sight for enhanced visibility, and potentially offering upgrades or customization options for improved target acquisition.
Which One Should You Choose?
The choice between the M&P and M&P 2.0 largely depends on your individual preferences and priorities.
-
Choose the M&P if: You're on a tighter budget and prioritize reliability above all else. The original M&P is a proven performer, and its functionality remains excellent. You might also prefer the original's slightly less aggressive grip texture.
-
Choose the M&P 2.0 if: You prioritize improved ergonomics, a smoother trigger pull, ambidextrous controls, and a more comfortable shooting experience. The upgrade in trigger, grip, and handling significantly enhances accuracy and overall shootability.
Ultimately, handling both models and testing them at a range is the best way to determine which pistol feels best in your hand and meets your specific needs. Both the M&P and M&P 2.0 remain excellent choices for self-defense, target shooting, or duty use, but the 2.0 represents a noticeable refinement and improvement upon its predecessor.
